In the Crosshairs of Disrespect: Analysing Parental Responsibility and the Impact of Mature Video Games on Child Behaviour

Text to speech



The growing issue of disrespect and disregard among children towards peers, adults, and the wider public is becoming increasingly concerning. It’s not just a phase or typical adolescent rebellion we’re observing, but a deep-seated problem of lack of respect. This problem manifests in various forms, such as disrespectful interactions in classrooms and playgrounds, online bullying, and insolence towards adults and figures of authority (O’Brennan, Bradshaw & Sawyer, 2009).


This issue transcends cultural and social boundaries and has people questioning its root cause. The repercussions are extensive – the seeds of this behaviour can sprout into weeds of discord, undermining the fabric of our society. This behaviour obstructs constructive dialogue, breeds hostility, and can potentially lead to both emotional and physical violence (O’Brennan et al., 2009).


In the quest to uncover the causes of this problem, we must scrutinize the primary socializing agents in a child’s life: the parents. Coupled with the rapidly changing digital landscape, specifically the consumption of mature video games like Grand Theft Auto, we may find clues pointing to why respect and regard for others seem to be on a steady decline among today’s youth (Anderson et al., 2010).


The ripple effects of the rising wave of disrespect among children extend far beyond individual interactions and touch every aspect of society. These behaviours, when unchecked, pose a threat to our society’s foundation, built on mutual respect and understanding.


When children fail to learn the value of respect, these behaviours persist into adulthood, manifesting in various societal issues. For instance, the breakdown of constructive dialogue, increased hostility, and divisions can arise (Twenge, 2017). Furthermore, this attitude fosters a culture of distrust and animosity, leading to heightened bullying incidences, emotional distress, and potential lifelong trauma (Espelage, 2014).


From a broader perspective, the disregard for societal norms and authority could lead to increased antisocial behaviour and violence. This disruption not only creates an unstable environment but also places a significant strain on law enforcement and judicial systems (Ferguson, 2011).


In an increasingly globalized world, the necessity for respect becomes even more critical. Disrespect can exacerbate misunderstandings and conflicts in cross-cultural interactions (Gudykunst, 2005).


In professional spaces, a lack of respect could result in toxic work environments, marked by internal conflicts, decreased productivity, and high employee turnover (Porath & Pearson, 2013).


In essence, the growing disrespect among children today extends beyond their immediate environment. It could potentially influence every aspect of our lives, from interpersonal relationships to workplaces, and even on a global scale.


In the face of a rising tide of disrespect among children, it is imperative to identify and scrutinize the key contributing factors fuelling this societal issue. Research increasingly suggests that a combination of diminished parental guidance and exposure to inappropriate video games, such as Grand Theft Auto, contribute significantly to this alarming trend (Anderson et al., 2010; Gentile, 2009).


Children largely learn from their observations and experiences, and in the absence of effective parental guidance, they are left to interpret the world predominantly by themselves. This void can make them more susceptible to influences that may not align with societal values of respect and empathy (Parke et al., 2004).


Concurrently, many children gain unrestricted access to video games that are not age appropriate. Grand Theft Auto, a game infamous for its graphic violence and adult themes, is increasingly finding its way into the hands of impressionable youth (Ferguson, 2011).


These two factors — diminishing parental guidance and the increasing influence of mature video games — are converging to form a potent combination that encourages disrespect and disregard among children. This combination presents a double-edged sword: while parents are progressively failing to instil values of respect and its significance, video games like Grand Theft Auto send messages that contradict these fundamental values, normalizing behaviours such as violence, disrespect, and lawlessness (Anderson et al., 2010).


In the sections to follow, we will delve deeper into these critical factors, providing a comprehensive understanding of their impacts on the behaviour of children today.


Section I: The Value and Importance of Respect


  1. Definition of respect: What it means and why it is crucial in a functioning society.


At its core, respect is an acknowledgment of the inherent worth and dignity of all individuals. It involves treating others as we would like to be treated ourselves, with courtesy, consideration, and understanding. This understanding extends beyond the personal realm, and includes treating other people’s time, space, ideas, and experiences with due regard (Fromm, 1976).


Respect is a multifaceted concept that encompasses various elements:


  1. Intrapersonal respect: This involves self-respect, including a positive self-image and self-esteem. It is the foundation upon which other forms of respect are built (Huang & Lynch, 1995).
  2. Interpersonal respect: This encompasses both respect for others as individuals (e.g., understanding, tolerance, acceptance) and behavioural respect (e.g., politeness, listening, affirming) (Wojciszke & Struzynska–Kujalowicz, 2007).
  3. Institutional and societal respect: This involves respect for societal rules, norms, and authority figures, as well as respect for cultural diversity (Tyler & Blader, 2000).


Importance of Respect in a Functioning Society:


Respect is the cornerstone of a healthy, functioning society. It fosters mutual understanding, peaceful coexistence, and effective collaboration, bridging the gap between individuals and promoting harmony within diverse communities.


Respect is an integral part of social interactions and a key factor in maintaining healthy relationships (Wojciszke & Struzynska–Kujalowicz, 2007). It promotes empathy, understanding, and positive communication, which are essential for healthy relationships, whether in the family, the workplace, or among friends.


Respect also plays a significant role in upholding societal norms and values (Tyler & Blader, 2000). When individuals respect laws, rules, and authority, society functions smoothly. Respect for cultural diversity and different viewpoints fosters an environment of acceptance and inclusivity, contributing to social cohesion and peace.


Respect forms the basis for ethical behaviour, acting as a deterrent against harmful actions towards others. It encourages personal responsibility and moral integrity, serving as a guiding principle for our actions and decisions (Huang & Lynch, 1995).


In sum, respect is not merely a social nicety but a fundamental necessity for a functioning society, underpinning our interpersonal relations, our societal structures, and our ethical compass.


  1. Respect vs Agreement: Highlighting that respect doesn’t necessarily mean agreement; it’s possible to disagree while still maintaining respect.


Respect and agreement are not mutually exclusive. In fact, they often intersect in meaningful and productive ways, contributing to the richness of our social fabric. However, it is important to understand that these are two distinct concepts and one can exist without the other.


Respect refers to the acknowledgment of the worth, rights, and dignity of others. It signifies an understanding that each person has their own perspectives, experiences, and feelings that are valid and deserve consideration (Huang & Lynch, 1995). On the other hand, agreement refers to sharing the same opinion, perspective, or decision about a particular matter.


Essentially, respect requires us to acknowledge and consider the viewpoints of others, even when we don’t agree with them. This form of respect, often referred to as ‘respect for persons,’ is crucial in maintaining civil discourse and fostering an inclusive society (Scanlon, 2003). It forms the basis for healthy disagreements where differences of opinion can be expressed without devaluing the other person.


Disagreements are natural and even necessary for growth and progress. They spark innovation, broaden perspectives, and promote a more thorough understanding of complex issues (Nemeth, 1986). However, for disagreements to be constructive, they must be underpinned by respect. Without respect, disagreements can devolve into harmful conflict, where the focus shifts from understanding differing viewpoints to attacking the person who holds them (Deutsch, 1990).


In a world that’s more interconnected and diverse than ever, it’s crucial to remember that it’s not only possible but necessary to disagree with respect. Respectful disagreements enable us to challenge our own biases, learn from others, and build stronger, more understanding relationships and communities.


  1. The role of parents in teaching respect: Emphasizing the role of parents in imparting the values of respect, understanding, and empathy.


Parents, or guardians, play a fundamental role in the socialization process of their children, including the inculcation of values like respect, understanding, and empathy. These values are primarily learned within the family context, through direct teaching, observation, and imitation (Grusec & Goodnow, 1994).


Parental behaviour is one of the most influential models for children’s behaviour. Parents who display respect in their interactions with others are more likely to raise children who behave similarly (Bandura, 1977). This involves showing courtesy to all people, listening attentively when others speak, accepting differing opinions with grace, and demonstrating understanding and empathy towards others’ feelings and experiences.


Explicit instruction is another effective way parents can teach respect. This can involve discussing with children what respect means, why it’s important, and how to display it in different situations (Berkowitz & Grych, 1998). Discussing real-life scenarios, children’s books, or TV shows can provide practical examples to help children understand how to demonstrate respect.


It’s also important for parents to set clear expectations for respectful behaviour and to consistently reinforce these expectations. Parents can encourage respectful behaviour by praising instances of it and addressing instances of disrespect. Importantly, this guidance needs to be communicated in a respectful manner, as harsh discipline may actually increase the likelihood of disrespectful behaviour (Gershoff & Grogan-Kaylor, 2016).


Furthermore, empathy plays a crucial role in fostering respect. Parents can promote empathy by encouraging children to consider others’ feelings and perspectives and by modelling empathetic behaviour themselves (Eisenberg, Spinrad, & Knafo-Noam, 2015).


In conclusion, parents, as primary socialization agents, hold a significant responsibility in nurturing respect, understanding, and empathy in their children. The way they fulfil this role can have a profound impact on their children’s attitudes and behaviours.


Section II: Lack of Parental Guidance – A Contributing Factor


  1. Analysis of current parenting practices: Discussion on how many parents are neglecting their duties, leaving their children to their own devices, literally and metaphorically.


Contemporary parenting practices have undergone significant changes with the advent of technology and evolving societal norms. Many parents, either due to lack of awareness, time constraints, or other stressors, are increasingly neglecting their duties, leaving their children to their own devices both literally and metaphorically (Radesky, Schumacher, & Zuckerman, 2015).


A study by Rideout, Foehr, and Roberts (2010) found that American children aged 8-18 spent an average of 7.5 hours a day using entertainment media, which did not include the time spent texting or talking on the phone. This data suggests that children are spending a large portion of their time engaging with media, often unsupervised.


This lack of supervision extends to the digital world, where parents often allow their children unfettered access to the internet and video games without fully understanding the potential risks and implications. This can result in exposure to inappropriate content, cyberbullying, and other online risks (Livingstone & Helsper, 2008).


Furthermore, this shift towards more autonomous and unsupervised use of media by children can contribute to a decrease in direct parent-child interactions. Studies suggest that such interactions play a crucial role in children’s social and emotional development (Hart, Newell, & Olsen, 2003). By failing to engage with their children, parents miss critical opportunities to impart values, set behavioural expectations, and provide guidance.


Moreover, in an era of ‘peer-oriented’ parenting, where some parents prioritize being friends with their children over being their mentors and guides, the enforcement of discipline and the inculcation of values such as respect have been compromised (Kuczynski, Marshall, & Schell, 1997).


In conclusion, current parenting practices, marked by unsupervised technology use and a lack of direct parental engagement and guidance, are contributing significantly to the wave of disrespect among children.


  1. Consequences of these practices: The potential harm that can arise from lack of proper supervision and guidance.


The lack of adequate parental supervision and guidance has several potential consequences that can detrimentally affect a child’s development and behaviour.


  1. Exposure to Inappropriate Content: Without supervision, children can inadvertently or purposefully access age-inappropriate content on the internet or in video games. This could expose them to explicit material, violence, or other harmful themes (Strasburger, Wilson, & Jordan, 2009).
  2. Increased Aggressiveness and Desensitization to Violence: Exposure to violent media content, like violent video games, has been associated with increased aggression and reduced empathy in children. It can also lead to desensitization towards violence, making it seem normal or acceptable (Anderson et al., 2010).
  3. Cyberbullying and Online Exploitation: Without proper parental controls and supervision, children become more susceptible to online threats like cyberbullying, harassment, and exploitation (Livingstone, Mascheroni, & Staksrud, 2018).
  4. Poor Social Skills and Disrespectful Behaviour: Lack of direct parent-child interactions can lead to deficient social skills. The lack of modelling and enforcement of respectful behaviour can contribute to children acting out disrespectfully towards peers, adults, and authority figures (Hart, Newell, & Olsen, 2003).
  5. Impaired Development of Values and Ethics: With the absence of guided moral and ethical discussions, children may find it difficult to understand and internalize important values like respect, empathy, and tolerance (Nucci, 2001).


In essence, the absence of proper supervision and guidance can expose children to a multitude of risks and potentially impair their social and emotional development. It is therefore imperative for parents to actively participate in their children’s digital lives and provide necessary guidance and supervision.


Section III: Influence of Video Games – Case Study: Grand Theft Auto


  1. Overview of Grand Theft Auto: Brief introduction to the game, its mature rating, and the explicit content.


Grand Theft Auto (GTA) is a popular video game series developed by Rockstar Games. Since its initial release in 1997, the franchise has released multiple instalments, each characterized by open-world environments where players can explore and complete various missions. However, the game is infamously known for its explicit content, encompassing violence, theft, substance abuse, and other criminal activities.


The Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB), the organization responsible for assigning age and content ratings for video games in the U.S., has consistently given the Grand Theft Auto series a mature rating. This ‘Mature 17+’ rating signifies that the content is intended for players aged 17 and up due to the presence of intense violence, blood and gore, sexual content and/or strong language (ESRB, n.d.).


GTA, like many other games of its genre, includes graphic scenes and themes that are not suitable for young players. Despite this, it’s not uncommon for underage children to have access to and play these games, often without full parental awareness of the explicit content involved (Olson, Kutner, & Warner, 2008).


The concern lies not only in the exposure to adult themes but also in the potential for these games to shape attitudes and behaviour. While the effect of violent video games on real-world aggression is still a topic of debate, some studies suggest that exposure to violent video games can increase aggression and decrease prosocial behaviour in players (Anderson et al., 2010). Other games of similar ratings and themes include “Saints Row” and “Mafia”, each presenting their own set of mature content and potential impacts on young players.


  1. The possible impacts on children: Discussion on what lessons a child might take from the game, focusing on violence, disrespect for authority, and illegal activities.


While video games can offer a range of benefits such as improving hand-eye coordination, problem-solving skills, and even social interactions in multiplayer settings, the potential negative impacts of mature-rated games like GTA on young minds cannot be ignored.


  1. Promotion of Violence: Grand Theft Auto, with its intense depiction of violence, can contribute to the normalization of such behaviour. Research suggests that exposure to violent video games can increase aggressive thoughts, emotions, and behaviours in the short term (Anderson et al., 2010).
  2. Disrespect for Authority: In the world of Grand Theft Auto, players often engage in activities that involve evading law enforcement and committing crimes. This can inadvertently communicate a message of disrespect for authority and the law, possibly influencing a child’s attitudes and behaviour in real life (Ferguson, 2015).
  3. Glorification of Illegal Activities: The gameplay in Grand Theft Auto often involves participation in illegal activities like theft, drug use, and other criminal behaviours. Over time, this may desensitize children to the seriousness of such actions and decrease their inhibitions towards risky behaviour (Gabbiadini et al., 2016).
  4. Exposure to Explicit Content: The explicit content in the game, including sexual content and strong language, is not age-appropriate for children. Continued exposure could lead to early sexualization and the use of inappropriate language (Brown & Bobkowski, 2011).


It’s crucial to note, however, that these effects can be influenced by several factors, including the child’s age, personality, and environment. The amount of time spent playing these games and the context in which they’re played (i.e., alone or with friends) also play important roles (Gentile & Stone, 2005).


Overall, while some children might be able to distinguish between the fictional world of video games and reality, others may internalize the messages and behaviours portrayed, potentially leading to negative real-world outcomes.


  1. The effects of game-induced desensitization: How constant exposure to violent and disrespectful behaviour in games could translate to real-world behaviour.


Desensitization refers to the diminishing emotional responsiveness to a negative or aversive stimulus after repeated exposure to it. In the context of video games, it can result from repeated exposure to violent or disrespectful behaviour, potentially leading to a lack of emotional response to real-world violence or disrespect, and even the normalization of such behaviours (Funk, Baldacci, Pasold, & Baumgardner, 2004).


  1. Increased Aggression: Numerous studies have shown that prolonged exposure to violent video games can lead to an increase in aggressive behaviour, thoughts, and emotions. This effect is believed to result from the desensitization process where violence becomes normalized and less emotionally impactful (Anderson et al., 2010).
  2. Decreased Empathy: Desensitization to violent content in video games can lead to decreased empathy and prosocial behaviour. This reduction in empathic responses can, in turn, impact how a child interacts with their peers, possibly leading to antisocial behaviour (Carnagey, Anderson, & Bartholow, 2007).
  3. Reduced Sensitivity to Real-world Consequences: By repeatedly engaging in violent or disrespectful behaviours without real-world consequences within the game environment, children may develop a skewed understanding of the consequences of such behaviours in the real world (Gabbiadini et al., 2016).
  4. Potential for Risky Behaviour: The glorification of risky and illegal activities in games like Grand Theft Auto can potentially lead to desensitization towards the risks and consequences of such behaviours, potentially increasing the likelihood of engaging in them in real life (Hull, Brunelle, Prescott, & Sargent, 2014).


These potential effects underline the importance of monitoring and regulating children’s exposure to mature content in video games. Parents and guardians should be mindful of the games their children are playing and ensure that they are appropriate for their age and maturity level.


Section IV: The Crucial Role of Parental Control in Gaming


  1. Why parents should regulate game consumption: Explaining the need for parents to monitor and regulate the video games their children are playing.


Parental involvement in a child’s gaming activities is pivotal to ensuring that their experiences with video games are positive, enriching, and age appropriate. Several reasons underline why parents should be active in regulating their children’s game consumption:


  1. Age-appropriate Content: Not all games are suitable for all age groups. It’s crucial for parents to understand the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) ratings and ensure that their children are playing games that are appropriate for their age and maturity level (Nikken & Jansz, 2006).
  2. Limiting Screen Time: Excessive screen time can lead to sedentary behaviour, impacting a child’s physical health. Setting limits on the duration of gaming sessions is an essential part of responsible screen management (Council on Communications and Media, 2016).
  3. Preventing Exposure to Harmful Content: Active monitoring can help prevent exposure to harmful content such as violence, explicit language, and adult themes present in games like Grand Theft Auto (Anderson et al., 2010).
  4. Promoting Healthy Gaming Habits: Parents can help their children develop healthy gaming habits, balancing their screen time with other important activities like studies, physical exercise, and social interactions (Gentile, Reimer, Nathanson, Walsh, & Eisenmann, 2014).
  5. Promoting Digital Literacy and Critical Thinking: By engaging in discussions about the games their children play, parents can promote digital literacy and help their children develop critical thinking skills. They can discuss the difference between real-world and game world consequences, and help children distinguish between the reality and the fiction they encounter in games (Király et al., 2018).


While many parents might feel out of their depth when it comes to video games, parental guidance and control software can help. These tools can help parents enforce time limits, ensure age-appropriate content, and even monitor online interactions, providing a safe and controlled gaming environment for children (Király et al., 2018).


  1. Effects of age-appropriate gaming: Comparing the effects of age-appropriate games on children’s behaviour.


While much attention has been given to the potential negative impacts of video games, it’s crucial to note that when games are age-appropriate and played in moderation, they can have positive effects on children’s cognitive and social development.


  1. Cognitive Development: Age-appropriate games can foster various cognitive skills such as problem-solving, strategic thinking, and hand-eye coordination. Research has shown that video games can lead to improvements in mental rotation skills, spatial skills, and even academic performance (Granic, Lobel, & Engels, 2014).
  2. Social Skills: Multiplayer games offer a social platform where children can engage with their peers, leading to improved teamwork and communication skills. They also provide a space for developing digital citizenship and understanding online etiquette (Anderson, Steen, & Stavropoulos, 2017).
  3. Emotional Development: Video games can also play a role in children’s emotional development. Research has found that video games can help children handle stress, manage emotions, and develop resilience. For example, the strategic planning required in many games can help children learn patience and persistence (Granic et al., 2014).
  4. Motivation and Achievement: Games often employ reward systems and challenges that can boost a child’s motivation and sense of achievement. When managed correctly, this can translate to a better work ethic and a more positive attitude towards challenges in real life (Ryan, Rigby, & Przybylski, 2006).


Despite these potential benefits, it’s important to ensure balance and moderation. Too much screen time or excessive reliance on video games for entertainment or emotional regulation can lead to negative outcomes such as sedentary behaviour, social isolation, or problematic gaming behaviour. Therefore, parental involvement and guidance remain crucial (Granic et al., 2014).


  1. Tools for parental control: Introducing various tools and strategies parents can use to ensure their children are consuming age-appropriate content.


Parents have access to a variety of tools and strategies to help monitor and regulate their children’s video game consumption. Some of these include:


  1. Built-In Parental Controls: Most gaming consoles and platforms come with built-in parental controls that allow parents to limit access to games based on their ESRB rating, control the amount of time spent playing games, and restrict online interactions (Entertainment Software Rating Board, 2020).
  2. Third-Party Parental Control Software: These are software programs or apps that parents can install on their devices to monitor and control their child’s gaming activities. They offer a wide range of features including setting time limits, blocking inappropriate content, tracking online activity, and setting alerts for risky behaviour (Király et al., 2018).
  3. Understanding ESRB Ratings: The Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) rates video games to provide concise and objective information about the content in computer and video games so parents can make informed purchase decisions. The rating includes information about the age appropriateness of the game, content descriptors, and interactive elements (Entertainment Software Rating Board, 2020).
  4. Active Engagement: Parents can also take a more active role by playing games with their children, discussing the content of the games, and using these discussions to teach about the difference between the game world and the real world, and about appropriate behaviour (Nikken & Jansz, 2006).
  5. Educational Games and Platforms: There are numerous educational games and platforms that are age-appropriate and can help children develop various skills. Parents can encourage their children to play these games to ensure they are learning while they are having fun (Granic, Lobel, & Engels, 2014).




Our analysis and review of literature strongly reaffirm the central role of parents in guiding their children towards respectful behaviour, fostering understanding, and helping them learn how to respectfully disagree. A significant part of this duty entails taking responsibility for the types of media their children consume, particularly video games.


As highlighted in the case of Grand Theft Auto, video games with mature content can have profound effects on impressionable minds. The explicit nature of such games and their potential to normalize violence, disrespect, and illegal activities further necessitate the need for parental guidance and control.


In this digital era, parents need to be actively involved in their children’s media usage, ensuring they are exposed to age-appropriate content, engaging in healthy screen time habits, and learning positive lessons from the games they play. As we have shown, the effects of age-appropriate gaming can be beneficial, fostering cognitive and social skills and encouraging emotional resilience.


Tools are available for parents to facilitate this control. From built-in parental controls on gaming consoles to third-party software and understanding ESRB ratings, parents can employ several strategies to create a safe and healthy gaming environment for their children.


Ultimately, while games can contribute positively to a child’s development, their impact significantly depends on the guidance provided by parents. Thus, as much as it is about controlling the exposure to potentially harmful content, it is also about teaching children the value of respect and demonstrating how to carry it into their interactions within and outside of the gaming world.


It is of paramount importance that parents take an active role in their children’s lives, not just offline, but also in their digital interactions. We live in a world that is increasingly influenced by digital media, where children can easily be exposed to content that is not age appropriate. Therefore, parents need to be vigilant, informed, and proactive in managing and understanding the games their children are playing.


Parental involvement extends beyond controlling and monitoring. It also includes understanding and engaging in dialogue with children about the content they consume. By playing games with their children, parents can transform gaming from a solitary or peer-exclusive activity into a family one that fosters communication and shared experiences. It also provides an opportunity to discuss real-world implications of in-game actions, thus teaching valuable lessons about respect and empathy (Coyne et al., 2017).


Parenting in the digital age might seem daunting, but resources are available to help parents navigate this landscape. Parents are encouraged to familiarize themselves with ESRB ratings, utilize parental controls available on gaming platforms, and consider third-party parental control software.


By taking these steps, parents can turn video games into tools for learning, development, and family bonding, rather than sources of harmful content. Above all, we must remember that teaching respect, encouraging understanding, and fostering empathy begin at home. It is through these actions that we can hope to see a generation that truly values and practices respect in all aspects of life.


While the challenges of raising respectful children in a digital age may seem daunting, there is immense potential for a more respectful future if we take the necessary steps today. We are at a juncture where technology and interactive media like video games have become integral parts of our lives. Used appropriately, these tools can enhance learning, foster social connection, and contribute to the holistic development of children.


Studies have shown that video games can improve problem-solving and strategic thinking, promote cooperation and teamwork, and even develop empathy when the content is age-appropriate and the gaming experience is guided effectively (Granic et al., 2014). This opens up a world of opportunities for shaping the next generation into respectful, understanding, and empathetic individuals.


By acknowledging the crucial role of parents and implementing effective strategies to manage children’s exposure to digital media, we can harness the potential of these interactive platforms to instil respect and understanding. This isn’t a task for tomorrow; it starts today, with each decision we make and each conversation we have with our children about their online activities.


The road to a more respectful future might be complex and winding, but it is one we must embark on for the well-being of our children and society as a whole. Let’s use the tools at our disposal, equip ourselves with the necessary knowledge, and guide our children towards a path of respect, empathy, and understanding. With concerted efforts, we can look forward to a future characterized by enhanced social cohesion, mutual respect, and more harmonious relationships.




  1. O’Brennan, L. M., Bradshaw, C. P., & Sawyer, A. L. (2009). Examining developmental differences in the social-emotional problems among frequent bullies, victims, and bully/victims. Psychology in the Schools, 46(2), 100-115.
  2. Anderson, C. A., Shibuya, A., Ihori, N., Swing, E. L., Bushman, B. J., Sakamoto, A., Rothstein, H. R., & Saleem, M. (2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behaviour in Eastern and Western countries: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 151-173.
  3. Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy–and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood–and What That Means for the Rest of Us. Atria Books.
  4. Espelage, D. L. (2014). Ecological Theory: Preventing Youth Bullying, Aggression, and Victimization. Theory into Practice, 53(4), 257–264.
  5. Ferguson, C. J. (2011). Video games and youth violence: A prospective analysis in adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(4), 377–391.
  6. Gudykunst, W. B. (2005). An Anxiety/Uncertainty Management (AUM) Theory of Effective Communication: Making the Mesh of the Net Finer. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing About Intercultural Communication (pp. 281–322). Sage Publications.
  7. Porath, C., & Pearson, C. (2013). The price of incivility: Lack of respect hurts morale—and the bottom line. Harvard Business Review, 91(1-2), 115–121.
  8. Fromm, E. (1976). To have or to be? Continuum International Publishing Group.
  9. Gentile, D. A. (2009). Pathological video-game use among youth ages 8 to 18: A national study. Psychological Science, 20(5), 594-602.
  10. Parke, R. D., Coltrane, S., Duffy, S., Buriel, R., Dennis, J., Powers, J., … & Widaman, K. F. (2004). Economic stress, parenting, and child adjustment in Mexican American and European American families. Child Development, 75(6), 1632-1656.
  11. Huang, L., & Lynch, J. (1995). Conceptualizing and measuring the high school learning environment. The High School Journal, 78(3), 148-156.
  12. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement. Psychology Press.
  13. Wojciszke, B., & Struzynska–Kujalowicz, A. (2007). Power influences self–esteem. Social Cognition, 25(4), 472-494.
  14. Scanlon, T. M. (2003). The difficulty of tolerance: Essays in political philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Nemeth, C. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93(1), 23-32.
  16. Deutsch, M. (1990). Sixty years of conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1(3), 237-263.
  17. Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child’s internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 4-19.
  18. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  19. Berkowitz, M. W., & Grych, J. H. (1998). Fostering goodness: Teaching parents to facilitate children’s moral development. Journal of Moral Education, 27(3), 371-391.
  20. Gershoff, E. T., & Grogan-Kaylor, A. (2016). Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(4), 453-469.
  21. Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Prosocial development. In M. E. Lamb (Vol. Ed.) & R. M. Lerner (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, Vol. 3: Socioemotional processes (pp. 610-656). Wiley.
  22. Radesky, J. S., Schumacher, J., & Zuckerman, B. (2015). Mobile and interactive media use by young children: The good, the bad, and the unknown. Pediatrics, 135(1), 1-3.
  23. Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
  24. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581-599.
  25. Hart, B., Newell, W., & Olsen, S. (2003). Parent-child Interaction: A Home Visiting Curriculum. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
  26. Kuczynski, L., Marshall, S., & Schell, K. (1997). Value socialization in a bidirectional context. In J. E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (p. 23–50). Wiley.
  27. Strasburger, V. C., Wilson, B. J., & Jordan, A. B. (2009). Children, adolescents, and the media (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  28. Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2018). European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1103–1122.
  29. ESRB. (n.d.). Ratings Guide. Entertainment Software Rating Board. Retrieved from
  30. Olson, C. K., Kutner, L. A., & Warner, D. E. (2008). The role of violent video game content in adolescent development: Boys’ perspectives. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23(1), 55-75.
  31. Gabbiadini, A., Riva, P., Andrighetto, L., Volpato, C., & Bushman, B. J. (2016). Acting like a Tough Guy: Violent-Sexist Video Games, Identification with Game Characters, Masculine Beliefs, & Empathy for Female Violence Victims. PLoS ONE, 11(4), e0152121.
  32. Brown, J. D., & Bobkowski, P. S. (2011). Older and Newer Media: Patterns of Use and Effects on Adolescents’ Health and Well-Being. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 95–113.
  33. Gentile, D. A., & Stone, W. (2005). Violent video game effects on children and adolescents. A review of the literature. Minerva Pediatrica, 57(6), 337-358.
  34. Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2006). Parental mediation of children’s videogame playing: a comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(2), 181-202.
  35. Council on Communications and Media. (2016). Media use in school-aged children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 138(5), e20162592.
  36. Gentile, D. A., Reimer, R. A., Nathanson, A. I., Walsh, D. A., & Eisenmann, J. C. (2014). Protective effects of parental monitoring of children’s media use: a prospective study. JAMA Pediatrics, 168(5), 479-484.
  37. Király, O., Griffiths, M. D., King, D. L., Lee, H. K., Lee, S. Y., Bányai, F., Zsila, Á., Takacs, Z. K., & Demetrovics, Z. (2018). Policy responses to problematic video game use: A systematic review of current measures and future possibilities. Journal of Behavioural Addictions, 7(3), 503-517.
  38. Granic, I., Lobel, A., & Engels, R. C. (2014). The benefits of playing video games. American Psychologist, 69(1), 66-78.
  39. Anderson, E. L., Steen, E., & Stavropoulos, V. (2017). Internet use and Problematic Internet Use: a systematic review of longitudinal research trends in adolescence and emergent adulthood. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(4), 430-454.
  40. Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30(4), 344-360.
  41. Entertainment Software Rating Board. (2020). Parental controls. Retrieved from
  42. Király, O., Griffiths, M. D., King, D. L., Lee, H. K., Lee, S. Y., Bányai, F., Zsila, Á., Takacs, Z. K., & Demetrovics, Z. (2018). Policy responses to problematic video game use: A systematic review of current measures and future possibilities. Journal of Behavioural Addictions,

Leave a Comment